Our story, so far. After losing in 2020 (you’ll remember this) the Petulant Pipsqueak whipped his armed, weak-thinking followers into a frenzy, convincing them the election had been stolen and encouraging them to go to the Capitol building and attack. He denies any of that – but there’s so much evidence. Later, the BBC edited some footage to make the point that he had whipped his armed, weak-thinking followers into a frenzy, convincing them the election had been stolen and encouraging them to go to the Capitol building and attack.

The Embarrassment didn’t like that, so he filed a $10 billion dollar defamation suit, because of course he did. He got used to broadcasters bowing to his demands for no reason other than he holds the key to their futures via the FCC. But the FCC has no authority over the BBC and the BBC chose to fight the charges. That starts with discovery and specifically a deposition. The dotard doesn’t sit for depositions because they make him look so very, very bad.

The BBC is trying to depose him right now, but he keeps avoiding it. He has been ordered to undergo the deposition by December 11, 2026 or the suit will be dismissed. The rule, of course, is that Trump Always Chickens Out and I’m putting the TACO date at December 10. This is nothing but a vexatious lawsuit and he knows he’s going to lose but he’ll drag it out as long as possible.

But, waiting in the wings, also slated to be deposed in favor of the BBC? Jack Smith. Jack Smith is the prosecutor who was preparing to put Trump in prison before his case was derailed by a series of unfortunate events that let a corrupt DOiJ take control. Jack Smith has ALL of the details. Jack Smith recently testified to Congress that he felt sure he was going to convict Trump on the charges. The very LAST thing Trump wants is for Jack Smith to be deposed in the case. December 10. You mark my words…

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Okay, so, honestly? I think it’s kind of funny. I don’t accept the ‘New York Times’ as a trustworthy news source. I haven’t since they helped 43 start his criminal war in Iraq. Remember the Yellowcake lies? But the Times has reported that the Democrats DID, indeed, recruit a candidate named Dan Sullivan to run against incumbent Dan Sullivan as a way to draw votes away from the incumbent.

Now the question: is that dirty or clever? Both, it seems. MAGA will be focusing, today, on the “dirty” side, outraged and furious that the Dems would stoop so low. They are less vocal about THEIR backing a Democratic candidate, Eric Hafner, in a House race. Hafner is running from a prison cell and drawing votes away from the main progressive candidate against Republican incumbent Rep. Nick Begich. Oh, yeah, the cell he’s campaigning from is in New York state! Hafner has never set foot in Alaska.

THAT one was a-okay with the cons. I thought I should mention it because you KNOW the cons aren’t going to. Our National Shame filed a preemptive lawsuit asking the court to rule that nobody is allowed to win but the Republican 47 prefers. No, those were not his exact words, but that’s the effect. The Dumbass didn’t file any lawsuits about Hafner running and drawing votes. It seems the Demented Don doesn’t think that’s rigging. It’s only rigging when the Dems to it to the cons, see. It’s clever when the cons do it to the Dems. In fairness to the GOP, Hafner wasn’t recruited. He filed his own paperwork. He’s just being backed by cons.

Our National Embarrassment is going to lose his suit. You see, in Alaska, the practice is legal. I DO believe that a guy running from a prison cell in a different state demonstrates a certain failure in the interpretation of the rules. Hafner is running in a House race. The Constitution says that one of the requirements is that the candidate must be an “inhabitant” of the state they seek to represent at the time of the election. Alaska’s Supreme Court, likely after smoking a HUGE blunt, decided that means the candidate doesn’t have to be an inhabitant of the state until they’re elected.

There’s no word on how Hafner becomes an inhabitant of Alaska while incarcerated in New York, but the court let him run because “anything might happen.” Hafner – a dangerous threat to society, by the way – says he expects a compassionate release if he wins. I’ll be more comfortable if the prison system has him serve his entire sentence.

Ancient history, right? Well, no. Hafner’s success will be judged this November 3rd, the same as Dan Sullivan’s. That means that right now, Alaska has two candidates on the ballot backed by one party to draw votes from the biggest threat in the other party. At least Dan Sullivan is an honest to gods resident of Alaska. But The Pedo is only complaining about one. Curious…

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Hey, yet another example of a legal action based on nothing but pique. A judge has ruled that Maureen Comey was fired illegally and her job must be returned along with full back pay and benefits. So, Evil Don’s DOiJ has file yet another indictment against her father, James Comey. James once led the FBI. James understands trump is a criminal, so the right hates him.

Maureen brought a little heat of her own. She is a prosecutor. She was investigating the links between Trump and his best friend Jeffrey Epstein, two of the three leaders in what is proving to be an international child sex-trafficking ring. That’s why she was fired. The LAST thing Trump wants is a competent prosecutor looking into his child sex trafficking ring…

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In response to Prop 40, rich people have gone out and hired a crew of work-a-day looking people to tell you why taxing rich people is probably a bad thing. They show, for example, an Hispanic woman dressed in a housekeeping outfit saying rich people shouldn’t have to pay taxes. Maybe she believes that. There are plenty of MAGA out there, not understanding things. Then again, maybe she’s an actress who wanted the acting job. Perhaps she needed the pay.

But the One Percent certainly can’t portray Jay Gatsby saying he doesn’t think he and his rich friends should have to pay. That’s too obvious. So they put out a working-class looking type. It seems more likely the people in the ads are the heirs to the fortunes, playing dress-up, trying to convince the poors to keep suffering so the rich never have to. It’s rather a sorry comment on the electorate that it works…